Should Mike Wise have been suspended from the Washington Post?
Mike Wise, a sports columnist for The Washington Post, said he wanted to show how irresponsible and inaccurate reporting in social media can be. He made his point by being irresponsible and inaccurate in social media, using his Post-affiliated Twitter account to willfully report false news while admitting it on his radio show. He said he wanted to show that people would pass on his false news without "checking facts or sourcing."
His bosses at the Post, who tend to be big fans of things like accuracy and credibility and not lying to their readers, were displeased. Wise was suspended for a month, he reportedly announced on his radio show this morning.
DC Sports Bog has a round-up of the events and response. Twitter erupted this morning after news of the suspension broke.
There's little disagreement that it was a dumb, dumb stunt, but now put yourself in the shoes of Wise's bosses. How would you have responded? Is a one-month suspension too short, too long or just right?
And as horribly executed as his experiment was, did he have a point about how news is spread online?
UPDATE 12:33 p.m.: Dan Steinberg of DC Sports Bog defended his colleague to TBD's Erik Wemple.
UPDATE 2:37 p.m.: Steinberg posts the full text of Wise's on-air apology.
6 Comments
David Heyman
He should have been fired. He crushed his own credibility, which is the most valuable thing a journalist has. So from now on when you read, "A source tells Mike Wise....." you know that you are expected to do your own research to determine the validity.
Kiran Bhat
Wise is a solid columnist and an enjoyable radio personality. I read him for his valid opinions and a strong voice (i.e. the pieces Gilbert and Brashear), not for some Peter King-esque high and mighty version of sports "journalism." Admittedly, Wise was wrong about twitter being an illegitimate news source. Glazer and Schefter break news on twitter and do it well. Maybe it was a journalistic faux pas, but I don't think this episode kills his value as a columnist. So while I see where the Post is coming from, I disagree with the suspension.
Chris B.
Wait a minute? His bosses understand/use social media? I wonder if it was explained to them in print terms.
Your official 2 cents
Post a Comment