In the trenches of D.C.'s sports debates

Correction:

The poll question asks if the Redskins should "sign" Randy Moss. Since Moss was placed on waivers, they would be claiming him, not signing him, unless no team attempts to claim him while paying what he's owed under his current contract. In that case, he would become an unrestricted free agent and able to sign with any team.

Randy Moss waived, Redskins a fit?

November 1, 2010 - 03:10 PM
By Daniel Victor (Twitter @bydanielvictor)
Text size Decrease Increase
Randy Moss: Future Redskin? (Photo: Associated Press)

We haven't even heard the story of why it happened yet, but the Minnesota Vikings have waived wide receiver Randy Moss, according to reports all over the place.

It took just seconds for fans to start imagining him in a Redskins uniform, and it makes sense in a lot of ways. Danny Snyder loves his big names. Though Anthony Armstrong has made several big plays, the Skins don't have a reliable second receiver behind Santana Moss. And Donovan McNabb had his best year throwing to Terrell Owens, so he's ready for just about anything.

What do you think? Should the Skins take a chance on him?

 

Tags:
Short URL: http://tbd.ly/arklse

3 Comments

  • View all

Sort by:

  1. Sonny Melone Sonny Melone

    Sonny Melone

    Dec 30, 2010 - 08:51:20 PM

    The man is a proven winner...give him a chance. And who's to say, that if we had Randy Moss, that Donovan McNabb wouldn't have better numbers?

    • report abuse
  2. shamrick shamrick

    Steven Hamrick

    Nov 02, 2010 - 01:27:10 AM

    Why sign Moss if the QB is on his back and can't get the ball downfield?

    • report abuse
  3. Hendo Hendo

    Mike Henderson

    Nov 01, 2010 - 03:23:46 PM

    Absolutely. If the season is going to unravel into a farce, it might as well be the most amped-up farce possible.

    • report abuse
By posting comments to content found on TBD, you agree to the terms of service.

Post a Comment

You must be signed in to post comments on TBD