Does Sex Increase or Decrease Prostate Cancer Risk?
MichaelCastlemanPosted: Aug 27, 07 7:50pm Might sex raise men's risk for prostate cancer? That disturbing possibility has been raised by several studies over the past 10 years:
Fortunately, the latest, largest study shows just the opposite--that frequent sex protects against prostate cancer. This study, by researchers at Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and the National Cancer Institute surveyed 29,000 men, aged 46 to 81. They were asked to estimate their number of weekly ejaculations during their twenties, their forties, and during the past year. Compared with men who reported seven or fewer ejaculations per month (especially during their twenties), the men who experienced 21 or more were 33 percent less likely to develop prostate cancer. What's going on? Does sex raise prostate cancer risk? Or protect against it? The smart money says sex is protective. In medical research, the larger the study, the more valid it is likely to be. The studies showing that sex increases risk involved a few hundred men. The study showing that sex reduces it involved 29,000. But if sex reduces risk of prostate cancer, it's only protective if men avoid sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In women, infection with genital warts substantially boosts risk of cervical cancer. In fact, many experts now consider cervical cancer an STI. Researchers wondered if STIs might also increase risk of prostate cancer. Many studies--including the University of Iowa study mentioned above--show that a history of STIs, especially gonorrhea and syphilis, approximately doubles prostate cancer risk. It's not entirely clear how STIs spur development of prostate cancer, but these infections cause inflammation, which may either trigger cancerous cell changes or accelerates the growth of slow-growing cancers. Many studies have linked sexual frequency and number of partners to increased risk of STIs. So it now seems likely that it's the STIs, not the sex per se, that increases prostate cancer risk in the studies showing that finding. It seems probable that, like cervical cancer, prostate cancer is, to some extent, sexually transmitted. Other ways to reduce prostate cancer risk include:
Have Something to Say? |




Posted: Aug 28, 07 6:18am
Thanks for this very helpful information. You use the term "STI." From the context, I figure it is Sexually Transmitted Illness (instead of the more usual Sexually Transmitted Disease). Is that correct? What is the difference?
Posted: Aug 29, 07 11:02pm
I believe it's Sexually Transmitted Infection. If you ask me, it's more or less the same thing. But technically, STI refers to those infections that are asymptomatic and curable (I guess disease implies something that is obvious/serious and chronic). Also, the term 'infection' carries less stigma than 'disease'.
Posted: Sep 16, 07 3:37pm
Erica is correct. Sexually transmitted infection. This terminology is slowly replacing STD because public health people feel that "infection" carries less stigma than "disease."
Posted: Sep 16, 07 10:09pm
Thanks to both of you for the education.
Posted: Aug 28, 07 8:30am
Thank you for an informative article, Michael. I quibble with the presumption, however, that married men have more sex than single ones. From both your and my own years of advising the love and sexlorn, we both know it certainly is not always the case.
Posted: Aug 28, 07 11:07am
I am with Isadora on this. What a leap to assume that married people have more sex than single.
Posted: Sep 17, 07 10:46am
You're right. Many marriages are sexless or almost so, and many single folks have regular sex. However, according to studies like Sex in America (1994), on average, coupled people (married or cohabitating) have more sex than singles.