Torture, Waterboarding

SallyWhite

Posted: Nov 1, 07 9:29pm

Michael B. Mukasey seems highly qualified for our US Attorney General, until we get to the issue in the Senate Judiciary Hearings, about the definition of torture.

Judge Mukasey did well, until "the plague issue" of torture came up. He was clear what torture is, but when it came to waterboarding, he wafted.

I know there are political reasons for that, legal reasons for that, but I feel it is critical the AG Nominee, especially now, be on high ground.

I feel torture is unAmerican, uncivil, goes against the Geneva Convention, and has no place in democracy. That torture has been proven, even by military standards to not work, is another issue.

With the mess this administration has created without ever listening to others at home or in the world, with no diplomacy, I feel it is critical the AG Nominee has to be on the highest road. It lets the World and those of us who need some hope that all is not totally corrupted, know that someone, even in that position before the Senate Judiciary Committee can and will speak up. The Attorney General is to be a leader in what is morally proper.

(I find it so frustrating so many of these words have been misused, abused, turned inside out, and had their meaning and import diluted, if not changed.)

It is past time for civility, decency, honesty, and mindful forthrightness to be returned. The Truth needs to be spoken so it can prevail.

2 Comments // 2 Members

Posted: Nov 1, 07 11:38pm

Michael B. Mukasey seems highly qualified for our US Attorney General, until we get to the issue in the Senate Judiciary...

In pro wrestling once the bad guy breaks a rule the good guy can then break that rule too. That's where we're at WWF morality.

I agree with your doubts about Mr. Mukasey. I'm also concerned with his answer that the president may be above the laws of congress .

Posted: Nov 2, 07 9:48am

In pro wrestling once the bad guy breaks a rule the good guy can then break that rule too. That's where we're at WWF mo...

Thanks, Discaimer, I am concerned about the view the president is above the law as well. It seems he thinks so, but in checks and balances, I especially don't think the Attorney General should feel, think, and possibly act as if that were true.