I posted most of the article over on the Scary thread but wanted to put it here too - I see this thread is much more "active" these days.
SARAH PALIN, QUEEN OF THE NOBODIES
Thu Sep 4, 7:58 PM ET
By Ted Rall
Experience is Overrated. What About IQ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucru/20080904/cm_ucru/sarahpalinqueenofthenobodies
Take a look at these links. Doesn't believe that man has a role in global warming and not sure there is a problem with global warming. Partnered with oil to get protection of polar bears overturned based. Lied about a number of issues including her support of the bridge to nowhere.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/politics/animal/main4414049.shtml?source=mostpop_story
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/tech/main4415772.shtml
Take a look at these links. Doesn't believe that man has a role in global warming and not sure there is a problem with global warming. Partnered with oil to get protection of polar bears overturned based. Lied about a number of issues including her support of the bridge to nowhere.
I posted most of the article over on the Scary thread but wanted to put it here too - I see this thread is much more "active" these days.
SARAH PALIN, QUEEN OF THE NOBODIES
Thu Sep 4, 7:58 PM ET
By Ted Rall
Experience is Overrated. What About IQ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucru/20080904/cm_ucru/sarahpalinqueenofthenobodies
You claim you;re a writer. One would think that means you know a little about research and, perhaps, science.
That means you should know better than to use outdated material that was not considered accurate at the time of publication.
LMAO. 1999 book long since proven wrong.
You claim you;re a writer. One would think that means you know a little about research and, perhaps, science.
That means you should know better than to use outdated material that was not considered accurate at the time of publication.
Ah, ah, ah, I almost bit. I almost drug out all of the research I haven't even touched in almost a year. I almost went to the trouble.
Ah, ah, ah, I almost bit. I almost drug out all of the research I haven't even touched in almost a year. I almost went to the trouble.
No, I use simple sources for those I doubt have the ability to handle deeper information.
For example, if I had mentioned the first cases of aids come from the 40s, that some scientists date the first cases even earlier, the end of the 19th century, I'd have had to drag out all those resources, ones I left behind long ago because I thought everyone who worried about these things knew the opv claim was dead.
BTW, the source is apparently chimps in southern Cameroon.
No, I use simple sources for those I doubt have the ability to handle deeper information.
For example, if I had mentioned the first cases of aids come from the 40s, that some scientists date the first cases even earlier, the end of the 19th century, I'd have had to drag out all those resources, ones I left behind long ago because I thought everyone who worried about these things knew the opv claim was dead.
BTW, the source is apparently chimps in southern Cameroon.
Interesting, the article on Cameroon is one of the first ones listed when you google "OPV theory".
Also found on the first google page for OPV theory. Why work harder than you have to, right? K.I.S.S.
Interesting, the article on Cameroon is one of the first ones listed when you google "OPV theory".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/may/26/aids.topstories3
And when you make statements (end of the 19th century) you should include sources so people can see what you're leaving out.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/health/HealthRepublish_140819.htm
Also found on the first google page for OPV theory. Why work harder than you have to, right? K.I.S.S.
Posted: Sep 4, 08 9:22pm
Sleep tight and pleasant dreams
Posted: Sep 4, 08 10:10pm
Double standard? Liberal media? I think not...
http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=184086
Posted: Sep 4, 08 10:12pm
I posted most of the article over on the Scary thread but wanted to put it here too - I see this thread is much more "active" these days.
SARAH PALIN, QUEEN OF THE NOBODIES
Thu Sep 4, 7:58 PM ET
By Ted Rall
Experience is Overrated. What About IQ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucru/20080904/cm_ucru/sarahpalinqueenofthenobodies
Posted: Sep 4, 08 10:25pm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/politics/animal/main4414049.shtml?source=mostpop_story
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/tech/main4415772.shtml
Take a look at these links. Doesn't believe that man has a role in global warming and not sure there is a problem with global warming. Partnered with oil to get protection of polar bears overturned based. Lied about a number of issues including her support of the bridge to nowhere.
Posted: Sep 4, 08 10:48pm
I posted most of the article over on the Scary thread but wanted to put it here too - I see this thread is much more "active" these days.
SARAH PALIN, QUEEN OF THE NOBODIES
Thu Sep 4, 7:58 PM ET
By Ted Rall
Experience is Overrated. What About IQ?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucru/20080904/cm_ucru/sarahpalinqueenofthenobodies
Thanks, Kate. Excellent article.
Posted: Sep 4, 08 10:54pm
LMAO. 1999 book long since proven wrong.
You claim you;re a writer. One would think that means you know a little about research and, perhaps, science.
That means you should know better than to use outdated material that was not considered accurate at the time of publication.
Ah, ah, ah, I almost bit. I almost drug out all of the research I haven't even touched in almost a year. I almost went to the trouble.
Posted: Sep 4, 08 11:06pm
No, I use simple sources for those I doubt have the ability to handle deeper information.
For example, if I had mentioned the first cases of aids come from the 40s, that some scientists date the first cases even earlier, the end of the 19th century, I'd have had to drag out all those resources, ones I left behind long ago because I thought everyone who worried about these things knew the opv claim was dead.
BTW, the source is apparently chimps in southern Cameroon.
Interesting, the article on Cameroon is one of the first ones listed when you google "OPV theory".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/may/26/aids.topstories3
And when you make statements (end of the 19th century) you should include sources so people can see what you're leaving out.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/health/HealthRepublish_140819.htm
Also found on the first google page for OPV theory. Why work harder than you have to, right? K.I.S.S.