Yes, I understand your dilemma - you want to be positive, encouraging, and not hurt anyone's feelings and yet, on the other hand, you want to be honest and help the writer by giving constructive criticism.
I think you can be honest and critical and sensitive (not hurt the person's feelings too badly) if your good intentions are clear and obvious. In other words, you are not bashing the writer (and dashing his hopes), but rather you are helping and encouraging him to improve (since everyone is flawed in their writing).
So, I say to you, go ahead with your sincere criticism and may we all profit from your input and feedback.
Yes, I understand your dilemma - you want to be positive, encouraging, and not hurt anyone's feelings and yet, on the other hand, you want to be honest and help the writer by giving constructive criticism.
I think you can be honest and critical and sensitive (not hurt the person's feelings too badly) if your good intentions are clear and obvious. In other words, you are not bashing the writer (and dashing his hopes), but rather you are helping and encouraging him to improve (since everyone is flawed in their writing).
So, I say to you, go ahead with your sincere criticism and may we all profit from your input and feedback.
Posted: Sep 22, 08 2:49am
Yes, I understand your dilemma - you want to be positive, encouraging, and not hurt anyone's feelings and yet, on the other hand, you want to be honest and help the writer by giving constructive criticism.
I think you can be honest and critical and sensitive (not hurt the person's feelings too badly) if your good intentions are clear and obvious. In other words, you are not bashing the writer (and dashing his hopes), but rather you are helping and encouraging him to improve (since everyone is flawed in their writing).
So, I say to you, go ahead with your sincere criticism and may we all profit from your input and feedback.