Should Couples Retire at the Same Time?This article is a reprint from the Financial Planning Association. It's bound to happen at some point for working couples. One spouse gets the itch to retire, or is forced to retire because of poor health or job loss. Since couples typically like to retire together, tough questions emerge: Should the other spouse retire, too, or continue working? What impact will retiring together have on the couple's income and future retirement benefits? According to a July 2004 study by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, husbands and wives retire in the same year in one in five marriages, and half of all couples retire within two years of each other. As the study noted, "married couples often try to retire together." But this decision has grown much more complex in recent decades as more wives join the labor force, work at full careers, earn improved incomes, and participate in retirement plans. As a consequence, retiring close to each other may entail financial trade-offs. Here are several financial and non-financial issues that couples will need to weigh when deciding whether to retire together: Social Security. Assume that both working spouses are age 62 or older and are thus eligible for reduced or full Social Security retirement benefits. One spouse retires and begins collecting benefits. The second spouse generally is entitled to receive either a monthly check equal to half of the amount of the monthly benefit his or her spouse receives, or an amount based on his or her own earningswhichever is larger. (An exception for spouses collecting half of their spouse's Social Security benefits occurs if they are part of a government pension plan not covered by Social Security; then their benefits may be reduced or even eliminated.) Consequently, if the retiring spouse earns a considerably higher income than the other spouse, the second spouse could immediately retire without diminishing their total Social Security benefits. But if the second spouse is earning income comparable to or higher than the retired spouse, the decision is more difficult. That's because the longer the second spouse works, the higher his or her individual Social Security benefits will likely be when he or she ultimately retires. This trade-off is especially an issue where there are significant age differences. Say a husband retires at 66 at full retirement benefits, but his wife is only 62 at the time. If she retires right away and starts collecting monthly benefits based on her own earnings, those benefits will be reduced from what she would have collected had she worked to her full retirement age. Private retirement plans. Age and income differences are also important when figuring in benefits from employer retirement plans. Assume that both spouses work for employers with traditional pension plans that pay lifetime annuities, but one spouse is five years older than the other. As with the Social Security illustration, if the older spouse retires at his or her plan's normal retirement age, and the younger spouse retires, too, then the younger spouse won't be able to maximize his or her pension benefits. The same consequences apply where spouses participate in defined-contribution plans such as 401(k)s. Should the younger spouse retire when the older spouse retires, then the younger spouse no longer is able to contribute to his or her retirement nest egg. Health benefits. Increasingly crucial these days for retirees is the challenge of maintaining health care coverage should they retire before they qualify for Medicare. Say the husband retires at 65. He's eligible for Medicare. But his 63-year-old wife won't be eligible for two more years. The federal COBRA program covers only up to 18 months. So unless her employer offers a subsidized retiree health care plan, she'll probably have to either keep working or find potentially expensive private coverage, for which she may not qualify if her health is poor. Nonfinancial issues. The decision whether to retire when your partner retires is further complicated by nonfinancial factors. If one partner retiresparticularly early due to poor health or job lossthe other person may not be psychologically ready to retire. Couples sometimes have conflicting visions of retirementone wants to relax at home while the other wants to travelthat should be ironed out before both retire. Easing into retirement through reduced work hours, if possible, can help reduce financial and nonfinancial conflicts, but most important is to weigh the trade-offs before deciding. Have Something to Say? |




Posted: Dec 19, 07 5:26pm
Yes, there are financial considerations, however, lifestyle design, or non-financial issues as you call it, is just as important. Perhaps, even more so.
Happy couples spend many years learning each other- strengths and weaknesses. They create their own belief system and 'story' about their lives. That all changes when they retire. The story is erased and it's up to the couple to re-write it, to find new ideas and words to create the next transition of their lives. With such focus on money, I worry that people won't take time to do that.
Planning is key. Couple need to ask simple questions that are challengingly complex to answer like:
Who do I/we want to be when I/we grow up?
Is there something I'd you'd/we'd like to try now?
What's going to make me/you/ us happiest now?
Where should I/we live? (that's a tough one)
Just asking the question makes a difference, I think. Getting an answer is even better.
To paraphrase a poem, I am the one I am waiting for- or at least I hope to be soon.
What do you think?
CuriousDina
Posted: Dec 19, 07 5:55pm
In our case, my wife is five years younger than I am and will retire at about the same age I was when I pulled the ripcord. We planned financially so that she could retire anytime after she reached 62 and was able to collect SS along with her pension. But, she got a dream job at 63 and loves her work. In the meantime, I am retired and relegated to spending time on TBD - just kidding. I don't need to work and after 40 years, I chose to let go and move on.
In another year, my wife will qualify for salary + full social security - she will collect the max at her salary level - and that will probably run for at least a year since she just took a 3 year contract in September and has only another year and a half to full SS age when they do not deduct for earnings. Her pension keeps rising as the years and age add on so we will be in a better position than we calculated.
Life is pleasant. I am used to her working and me not. She loves her new job and I love retired life. I do dabble in real estate so I can say I am employed. It earns money which is nice. I have two condos in a happening building so when I go there, I have lots of interesting people to talk to.
I did enough in three careers and I am approaching 69 when I prefer to sleep late, read the morning paper and do as I please with my day. When leases expire, I become agent extraordinaire and rent them to someone else.
I didn't miss a day of school or a day of work in my life and now I don't miss school or work in the least. When I had my own businesses which was about half my career, I didn't take vacations either. So, I have given at the office - big time.
The nice thing about my profession is that if I change my mind, with a single phone call, I can be working the next day. I could work if I was blind crippled or crazy. I know some therapists who have anywhere between one and three of those features and they still practice. I hold that in my back pocket in case of financial emergency.
I don't know what will change when my wife retires. We have both similar and disparate interests and we will continue exercising all of them. We have a large enough house so that we don't get in each others' way when we want privacy and small enough so that we have plenty of togetherness. Maybe we'll get a pet. With our schedules, we never had that luxury except if it was in a bowl of water. I wouldn't mind walking a lizard or a tarantula or some such critter.