Posted: May 23, 08
2:26pm
There are times when I feel like I am on a different planet from my friends. Recently about a million people have told me that they've been glued to their televisions in fascination for the Presidential primary race. They can't get enough of political talk shows these days, and don't I agree? “Mmmm,” I usually say, not wanting to rain on anyone's parade or brand myself as an uninformed citizen.
The truth? I'm glad there is a real contest (as there has been in both party races). I stayed up late on the night of the Indiana and North Carolina primaries to watch the results. But I can't stand political talk shows, and I can't stand them even more during an election season. This is partly because of my opinion of the intelligence of most of the Talking Heads.
But my main objection to TV pundits is that they don't have the faintest idea what's coming down the road. This is not their fault -- there's no way to know at this point. But they're cast in a role that requires them to pretend that they do. So they read the tea leaves and study the entrails and pontificate about what will surely happen. I don't even mind this. Let them go ahead and predict - in six months they will have been proven spectacularly wrong, and no one will remember. (Try googling “Hillary a shoo-in for 2008.”) But having delivered themselves of these forecasts, they should shut up. No more blather about what will probably happen here and what might happen there and what surely WILL happen if the candidates do not heed the consensus of pundit advice.
Walter Shapiro, the political editor of salon.com, recently pointed out that for the past month no less than 70% of the primetime airtime on cable news networks has been devoted to the election. That is double the coverage they’ve given the entire rest of the world, Shapiro wrote, “from Burmese typhoons to a forgotten president named Bush.” TV coverage of the Democratic nomination endgame, he says, “is a debacle on par with the end of the O.J. trial.”
How do they fill up all that airtime? Since the supply of significant political news can't meet demand, news must be manufactured. Think polls. Any opinion surveys made this early, Shapiro writes: “have the predictive powers of a 7-year-old dressed up as a swami and using an upside down goldfish bowl to peer into the future.”
So, my political junkie friends, it is time to go cold turkey. From now until the conventions, you'd be better off watching reruns of Friends. Or paying attention to the rest of the world.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/05/17/electoral_map/index.html