Is the Golden Rule 'misstated'? How do I lower my expectations?

Paradigm Shifter

Posted: Jul 22, 08 10:38pm

The Golden Rule - Christianity Version:

Whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them.

It seems to me this is not exactly a good idea in relationships. We can't treat others how we expect to be treated and expect to get treated back the way we want to be.

I know I'm probably not making much sense, but follow me. If you treat someone a certain way in hopes that they'll treat you back the same way, it's a recipe for disappointment and heartache. Why? Because it presupposes the way you treat someone else is meaningful and appreciated by them. Furthermore, it presupposes the other person will treat you back the same way. This suggests that we expect others to share our personal value system, wants and needs. I have learned the hard way, this is not a good idea.

Perhaps it would be better stated:

Do so to men that which they would have done to them, so they may do so to you.

I know, I know...WHAAAAAAT? What I'm saying is that we need to show others love and respect in ways that are meaningful to them first before we can truly have hope they will show us love and respect in ways that are meaningful to us (kind of in keeping with Gary Chapman's books / ideas on the "five love languages").

What do you think? Do you agree? If you do, then can you help me develop this thinking further so that I can learn, and perhaps others may as well, how to lower my expectations in relationships in an effort to improve them manyfold times.

I look forward to your feedback.

14 Comments // 12 Members

Posted: Jul 22, 08 10:53pm

You can love any living creature.

Respect has to be earned.

Without respect love will fade.

Posted: Jul 22, 08 11:02pm

I see the points you are making in a slightly different way. Firstly, I think of the Golden Rule as a guidline for acting, without expectations. I "do unto others ..." because I think it's the right thing to do. Not so they will treat me well in return.

Your revision is interesting and at first glance I think I like it. However, I think most people recognize respect and good intentions, even if they would have done things differently.

As for lowering your expectations in relationships, I would suggest you read "The Mastery of Love" by Don Miguel Ruiz.

Posted: Jul 22, 08 11:07pm

The rule advises each of us to treat others as we would wish to be treated.

It does not say that if you do, you will be treated that way.

It suggests a way to live, not a contract with others

Posted: Jul 23, 08 12:41am

What I'm saying is that we need to show others love and respect in ways that are meaningful to them first before we can truly have hope they will show us love and respect in ways that are meaningful to us

I think that is the golden rule. If you want to receive what 's meaningful you must care enough to give the other person what is meaningful to them. You gave meaningful; you get meaningful. If you only give what's meaningful to you, you may only get back what is meaningful to the other person.

Of course this works only if the other person has enough care and insight to know what you value and to try to provide it. That is often not the case. Even with good intentions, many cannot see the world from someone elses eyes.

Also, doing something for someone else is not a promise that you will get the same in return. The Golden rule simply let's you know that helping out the other guy by putting yourself in his/her place will most often yield the best results. You still have to figure out who is capable of giving back on a long term basis, if for no other reason, because in order to continue to give to others, we all need to get something back to refuel ourselves.

Posted: Jul 23, 08 12:55am

I always thought it was, "Do unto others, then run. Before the police get there." Hmmmm.

Posted: Jul 23, 08 1:00am

Since you're quoting from the Bible version, we've got to assume that God, who is perfect, commands us to do this, and without thought of compensation or return of the favor. Even though this applies to all people, it was written to Christians, who are also commanded to "love your neighbor as yourself" and "love your enemies".

None of the commandments are to be followed with the thought of receiving something good in return, but often that happens. Rarely do I smile at someone without getting a smile back in return.

Also, the Golden Rule is something we can all role model, so others can see how it is to be done, particularly our children.

Posted: Jul 23, 08 2:00am

I think you may have misinterpreted the rule. It states, "Do unto others AS you would have them do unto you. In other words, it is required of you to make the first advance of caring. It is not a selfish rule. If you don't get back what you offer, it allows you to declare victory and advance to the rear but never live by "an eye for an eye" philosophy.

The best you can get from living by the golden rule is a return in kind of what you lay out there. The worst is that you can move on. It doesn't require you to stay and get battered, it simply asks you not to be aggressive even against those who would bring harm to you. The one that causes you to get battered is "turn the other cheek."

I cannot say that I always follow the golden rule. As a practicing therapist, I do to the benefit of my client but when someone in my personal life treats me in a vile manner or who asks for my opinion, they may get it straight up and to heck with PC behavior!

I like the funnier one that came out of the ghetto. Don't make promises with your mouth that your wallet can't keep.

Good discussion topic!