Karl Rove's Black Love Child

AnnBanks

Posted: Jan 25, 08 11:07am

Eight years ago this month, John McCain took the New Hampshire primary and was favored to win in South Carolina. Had he succeeded, he would likely have thwarted the presidential aspirations of George W. Bush and become the Republican nominee. But Bush strategist Karl Rove came to the rescue with a vicious smear tactic.

Rove invented a uniquely injurious fiction for his operatives to circulate via a phony poll. Voters were asked, "Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain...if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?" This was no random slur. McCain was at the time campaigning with his dark-skinned daughter, Bridget, adopted from Bangladesh

It worked. Owing largely to the Rove-orchestrated whispering campaign, Bush prevailed in South Carolina and secured the Republican nomination. The rest is history--specifically the tragic and blighted history of our young century. It worked in another way as well. Too shaken to defend himself, McCain emerged from the bruising episode less maverick reformer and more Manchurian candidate.

The former crusader against the Republican establishment has since turned into a Bush-hugging, business-as-usual politician who has backed down from many positions that set him apart from conventional conservatives. Before, McCain supported the separation of church and state; now he wants a Christian in the White House. The confederate flag, which he once considered an offensive symbol, no longer troubles him. And he has come to believe that tax cuts are a good idea.

I don't want to say that McCain sold his soul to the devil, since I believe that religious metaphors have no place in politics. But consider this: shortly after losing the 2000 election, McCain told an interviewer that there must be "a special place in hell" reserved for the rumormongers.

Seven years later, who is running McCain's South Carolina campaign? Charlie Condon, the former State Attorney General who in 2000 helped spread the innuendo targeting Bridget. If you can't beat them, hire them--even if they've launched racist attacks against your own daughter.

Bridget McCain was a seriously ill baby in Mother Teresa's orphanage when Cindy McCain visited and decided to bring her back to the United States for medical treatment in 1991. John and Cindy adopted her not long after. Now 16, Bridget learned of her role in the 2000 campaign only when she Googled herself. According to the New York Times, when McCain entered the current race, Bridget summoned his aides and asked them to pledge that this campaign would be different.

We can't know what reassurances were offered, but Condon doesn't seem to have repented for his role in the 2000 slander. He told the New York Times reporter that he wasn't surprised about the downward spiral of the Bush-McCain race. "Our primaries have a way of doing that," Condon said. "There is a tradition of it, it is accepted behavior, and frankly it works."

John McCain is now favored to win in South Carolina. The personal attacks of the 2000 election season, he recently told an interviewer, were "long ago and far away." "I had to get over it.... I don't ever think about them or dwell on them." Cindy McCain agrees. "We're past that. We've moved on."

The McCains may have moved on, but I haven't. Bush made a decisive step toward the White House by spreading lies about an 8-year-old child. (Not to mention a couple of decorated war veterans.) These vile tactics are not OK. If something similar were to happen in a high school election, those responsible would be suspended and black marks would be entered on their permanent records. But in politics, it seems, there's no such thing as a permanent record. Consequences do not exist--however blatant the misconduct.

It's time we changed that. In the 2008 election, voters need to send a message that attention is being paid--that this time liars and cheats will be defeated, not given a free hall pass.

51 Comments // 13 Members

Posted: Jan 25, 08 11:23am

Eight years ago this month, John McCain took the New Hampshire primary and was favored to win in South Carolina. Had he ...

So, do you support HillBilly because it's in a pants suit or do you really think four more years of clinton deceit and running to get ahead of the latest poll is good for the country??

Posted: Jan 25, 08 11:42am

Eight years ago this month, John McCain took the New Hampshire primary and was favored to win in South Carolina. Had he ...

Dirty politics are the norm... because they are effective! Only the voters can stop this downward spiral. And enough of them don't know it or could care less. Maybe that's why over 90% of incumbents win re-election.

Here in Detroit we are now party to our own scandal as our mayor and his chief of staff have been found to have had an affair while both were married and to have lied under oath about it as well and they destroyed the careers of three whistleblowers who they discredited and called "liars" in court. Our mayor is a democrat by the way.

Thanks to the precedent that Mr. Clinton (and his wife) set many years ago many believe that this is a private matter and has no bearing on our mayor's ability to lead. Our mayor's own father said this was irrelevent to his career and is a private matter. never mind that the whistleblowers sued and were awarded 8 million in damages. So the taxpayers lose since money is tight and services are cut to meet budget targets. And lying under oath now becomes acceptable.

It seems the more forgiving we become the lower our standards become as well. Dirty pool in politics has been going on forever, now the stakes ($$$) are even higher and special interest groups own both parties.

If you want to eliminate the ugliness of politics then you'll need to reward those who run "positive" campaigns. Good luck!!

PS - I'm a liberal, not a democrat. They suck too!

Posted: Jan 25, 08 11:49am

Dirty politics are the norm... because they are effective! Only the voters can stop this downward spiral. And enough of ...

Well said, Rick.

Posted: Jan 25, 08 1:16pm

So, do you support HillBilly because it's in a pants suit or do you really think four more years of clinton deceit and r...

Fromz --

I wasn't meaning to endorse any candidate in the election -- just to point out the nastiness of the dirty tricks that we're now almost resigned to. I like to think that if McCain had fought back these kind of tactics would not now be the norm.

Posted: Jan 25, 08 1:32pm

So, do you support HillBilly because it's in a pants suit or do you really think four more years of clinton deceit and r...

It may not have been your intent but I can find your post, the style, the this is a bad person, hardly hidden behind the words, in the Clinton play book.

It's so their style, it wouldn't surprise me to find the information came from them, no matter where you got it.

SackDaPack
SackDaPack
Founding Member

Posted: Jan 25, 08 1:37pm

Eight years ago this month, John McCain took the New Hampshire primary and was favored to win in South Carolina. Had he ...

Ann,

Thanks for the update on Rove and the SC hit job. John W. Dean does a great job explaining Rove in his book "Worse Than Watergate." Yes, John is a Republican.

Politics has definitely spiralled downward. I do not have the ultimate answer, but I do see some bright spots. In the 2006 election, we had a doctor that ran for Congress and won. Since he was independently wealthy, he did not need to accept donations from anyone especially private interest groups. He was visciously attacked by the Rebulican hit machine, and yet he still prevailed. We also have a long time Senator (Herb Kohl) that runs for re-election with his own money. These are both people that see politics as a chance to serve the public and fix things they see that are wrong. They are not in it to line their pockets. Or, as in the case of W. trying to make a big name for himself by taking on the guy his daddy was smart enough to leave bottled up.

FYI

Newsweek has a good article in this week that reviews the Republican Candidates, "In the Shadow of Bush".

No Fromz, I do not expect you to agree with me. I figure I would have as much luck convincing you on politics as I would have convincing you that Global Change is for real and that Mankind is a contributing factor.

Posted: Jan 25, 08 1:57pm

Ann,

Thanks for the update on Rove and the SC hit job. John W. Dean does a great job explaining Rove in his book "Wo...

Climatel change is real. Man's complicity is very questionable.

You may think Rove is a rat but compared to the clintons - dirty chinese money, lies about competitiors, pardons for sale, etc, he's a nice guy.