Posted: Aug 20, 07
3:14pm
I had three valuable replies to the following question, posted at Q&A. These insightful responses incited more questions, desiring further discussion. The question was;
Should asking my husband, "what did you do" or "what did you do with" be considered an attack?
In our motorhome bathroom there a two ways to turn on the light, on the fixture itself and at the switch. If the light is turned off at the fixture, the switch doesn't work. Since I prefer consistency by using the switch and noticed the switch was in the on position but no light, I asked "what did you do to the light? I used a normal voice with no inflection that showed displeasure or condescension. His reaction to that question was resentment that "I am always assuming wrongdoing on his part".
I feel that making an issue of the question is overreacting and petty, possibly designed to make me feel poorly about my communication skills, or he has a really big issue with blame.
Yes I new exactly what was done with the switch. Yes it was a shortcut to address my preference.
This scenario is very prevalent in our relationship, whenever I make the remotest acknowledgment of something negative. I don't want to focus on blame but more on getting to the root of the problem. Is the root an unnecessary part of the program ? Will the problem eventually take care of itself after years of getting answers by designing my questions more effectively, avoiding "hot buttons"? Are hot buttons something learned from previous relationships (baggage) that should be addressed or is it entirely up to me to find the buttons, like land mines, detonate them and come up with a plan to reroute the next time.